Conditional populist voting in Chile, Greece, Spain, and Bolivia.
Andreadis, I.; Hawkins, K. A.; Llamazares, I.; and Singer, M. M.
In Hawkins, K. A.; Carlin, R.; Littvay, L.; and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., editor(s),
The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, pages 238–278. Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge, 2019.
![Conditional populist voting in Chile, Greece, Spain, and Bolivia [pdf]](//bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "Paper")
Paper
link
bibtex
@incollection{chapter10,
title = {Conditional populist voting in {Chile}, {Greece}, {Spain}, and {Bolivia}},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
url = {http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/TIAP-Chapter10.pdf},
booktitle = {The {Ideational} {Approach} to {Populism}: {Concept}, {Theory}, and {Analysis}},
publisher = {Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge},
author = {Andreadis, Ioannis and Hawkins, Kirk A. and Llamazares, Ivan and Singer, Matthew M.},
editor = {Hawkins, Kirk A. and Carlin, Ryan and Littvay, Levente and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal},
year = {2019},
pages = {238--278},
}
Public Opinion Surveys: a New Scale.
Castanho Silva, B.; Andreadis, I.; Anduiza, E.; Blanuša, N.; Corti, Y. M.; Delfino, G.; Rico, G.; Ruth, S. P.; Spruyt, B.; Steenbergen, M.; and Littvay, L.
In Hawkins, K.; Carlin, R.; Littvay, L.; and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., editor(s),
The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, pages 128–149. Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge, 2019.
Paper
link
bibtex
@incollection{CastanhoSilva2017,
title = {Public {Opinion} {Surveys}: a {New} {Scale}},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
url = {http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/TIAP-Chapter7.pdf},
booktitle = {The {Ideational} {Approach} to {Populism}: {Concept}, {Theory}, and {Analysis}},
publisher = {Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge},
author = {Castanho Silva, Bruno and Andreadis, Ioannis and Anduiza, Eva and Blanuša, Nebojša and Corti, Yazmin Morlet and Delfino, Gisela and Rico, Guillem and Ruth, Saskia P. and Spruyt, Bram and Steenbergen, Marco and Littvay, Levente},
editor = {Hawkins, Kirk and Carlin, Ryan and Littvay, Levente and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal},
year = {2019},
pages = {128--149},
}
Elite Surveys.
Andreadis, I.; and Ruth, S. P.
In Hawkins, K.; Carlin, R.; Littvay, L.; and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., editor(s),
The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, pages 112–127. Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge, 2019.
Paper
link
bibtex
@incollection{Andreadis2017,
title = {Elite {Surveys}},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
url = {http://www.polres.gr/en/sites/default/files/TIAP-Chapter5.pdf},
booktitle = {The {Ideational} {Approach} to {Populism}: {Concept}, {Theory}, and {Analysis}},
publisher = {Democracy and Extremism Series, Routledge},
author = {Andreadis, Ioannis and Ruth, Saskia P.},
editor = {Hawkins, Kirk and Carlin, Ryan and Littvay, Levente and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal},
year = {2019},
pages = {112--127},
}
Investigating the effects of populist communication.
Hameleers, M.; Andreadis, I.; and Reinemann, C.
In Reinemann, C.; Stanyer, J.; Aalberg, T.; Esser, F.; and de Vreese, C. H., editor(s),
Communicating Populism, pages 168–182. Routledge, March 2019.
![Investigating the effects of populist communication [link]](//bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "Paper")
Paper
doi
link
bibtex
abstract
@incollection{Hameleers2019,
title = {Investigating the effects of populist communication},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
url = {https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/investigating-effects-populist-communication-michael-hameleers-ioannis-andreadis-carsten-reinemann/10.4324/9780429402067-9},
abstract = {This chapter describes the method of a 15-country, comparative online experiment (2*3 design + 2 control groups) carried out in Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK. Most importantly, it examines the decisions made in relation to the experimental design. The experiment defined populism as a discursive social identity frame, extending previous conceptualizations of populist communication by offering a comprehensive manipulation of populist ideas on the left and right wing. The chapter outlines the quality checks and analysis strategies employed to prepare and analyze the large dataset (N = 14,499). It provides background information on the sample, panel companies and quotas, and distribution. Finally, based on this, it makes methodological recommendations for future endeavors that aim to dissect the effects of (populist) communication on a diversified international electorate.},
booktitle = {Communicating {Populism}},
publisher = {Routledge},
author = {Hameleers, Michael and Andreadis, Ioannis and Reinemann, Carsten},
editor = {Reinemann, Carsten and Stanyer, James and Aalberg, Toril and Esser, Frank and de Vreese, Claes H.},
month = mar,
year = {2019},
doi = {10.4324/9780429402067-9},
pages = {168--182},
}
This chapter describes the method of a 15-country, comparative online experiment (2*3 design + 2 control groups) carried out in Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK. Most importantly, it examines the decisions made in relation to the experimental design. The experiment defined populism as a discursive social identity frame, extending previous conceptualizations of populist communication by offering a comprehensive manipulation of populist ideas on the left and right wing. The chapter outlines the quality checks and analysis strategies employed to prepare and analyze the large dataset (N = 14,499). It provides background information on the sample, panel companies and quotas, and distribution. Finally, based on this, it makes methodological recommendations for future endeavors that aim to dissect the effects of (populist) communication on a diversified international electorate.
Attitudinal and Behavioral Responses to Populist Communication.
Andreadis, I.; Cremonesi, C.; Kartsounidou, E.; Kasprowicz, D.; and Hess, A.
In Reinemann, C.; Stanyer, J.; Aalberg, T.; Esser, F.; and de Vreese, C. H., editor(s),
Communicating Populism, pages 207–232. Routledge, March 2019.
doi
link
bibtex
abstract
@incollection{andreadis_attitudinal_2019,
title = {Attitudinal and {Behavioral} {Responses} to {Populist} {Communication}},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
abstract = {This chapter investigates effects of populist message cues on populist attitudes and voting intentions. After giving a general overview about populist attitudes and the propensity to vote for populist parties in the 15 participating countries, the chapter turns to a set of effects analyses. Effects on populist attitudes were also small, but the analysis is at least able to show that people-centrism, anti-immigrant, and left-wing anti-outgroup cues had the potential to change certain dimensions of populist attitudes (people-centrism, anti-wealthy attitudes). In addition, effects on voting intentions became apparent in at least five countries (Greece, Norway, Romania, Sweden, and Switzerland). Generally, the chapter shows that effects are very context-specific, with certain populist messages being completely ineffective in some countries, while resonating with audiences in others. In addition, depending on the national contexts, the same kinds of populist cues might benefit different kinds of populist parties.},
booktitle = {Communicating {Populism}},
publisher = {Routledge},
author = {Andreadis, Ioannis and Cremonesi, Cristina and Kartsounidou, Evangelia and Kasprowicz, Dominika and Hess, Agnieszka},
editor = {Reinemann, Carsten and Stanyer, James and Aalberg, Toril and Esser, Frank and de Vreese, Claes H.},
month = mar,
year = {2019},
doi = {10.4324/9780429402067-11},
pages = {207--232},
}
This chapter investigates effects of populist message cues on populist attitudes and voting intentions. After giving a general overview about populist attitudes and the propensity to vote for populist parties in the 15 participating countries, the chapter turns to a set of effects analyses. Effects on populist attitudes were also small, but the analysis is at least able to show that people-centrism, anti-immigrant, and left-wing anti-outgroup cues had the potential to change certain dimensions of populist attitudes (people-centrism, anti-wealthy attitudes). In addition, effects on voting intentions became apparent in at least five countries (Greece, Norway, Romania, Sweden, and Switzerland). Generally, the chapter shows that effects are very context-specific, with certain populist messages being completely ineffective in some countries, while resonating with audiences in others. In addition, depending on the national contexts, the same kinds of populist cues might benefit different kinds of populist parties.
Dynamics of Polarization in the Greek Case.
Andreadis, I.; and Stavrakakis, Y.
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1). 2019.
doi
link
bibtex
abstract
@article{andreadis_dynamics_2019,
title = {Dynamics of {Polarization} in the {Greek} {Case}},
volume = {681},
copyright = {All rights reserved},
issn = {15523349},
doi = {10.1177/0002716218817723},
abstract = {© 2019 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science. This article focuses on the dynamics of polarization emerging within Greek political culture in the postauthoritarian setting. Following a brief historical framing, we trace Left–Right polarization between the two major parties of the period: Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) and New Democracy (ND). The party-based polarization of PASOK/ND was arguably the main axis of political antagonism in Greece from the 1970s until the end of the 2000s. By 2009, polarization had ebbed due to an ideological convergence of the two parties toward the center, but the onset of the 2009 economic crisis dislocated the established two-party system and facilitated the emergence of a new political landscape comprising many new political actors, most notably the Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA. Using a predominantly quantitative methodology, we focus on a set of dimensions of polarization brought forward or re-activated within the context of economic crisis.},
number = {1},
journal = {Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
author = {Andreadis, I. and Stavrakakis, Y.},
year = {2019},
keywords = {Europe, Greece, crisis, polarization, populism},
}
© 2019 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science. This article focuses on the dynamics of polarization emerging within Greek political culture in the postauthoritarian setting. Following a brief historical framing, we trace Left–Right polarization between the two major parties of the period: Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) and New Democracy (ND). The party-based polarization of PASOK/ND was arguably the main axis of political antagonism in Greece from the 1970s until the end of the 2000s. By 2009, polarization had ebbed due to an ideological convergence of the two parties toward the center, but the onset of the 2009 economic crisis dislocated the established two-party system and facilitated the emergence of a new political landscape comprising many new political actors, most notably the Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA. Using a predominantly quantitative methodology, we focus on a set of dimensions of polarization brought forward or re-activated within the context of economic crisis.
![Methodological Challenges in the Study of Political Elites [link]](http://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "Paper")
Paper
link
bibtex
![Conditional populist voting in Chile, Greece, Spain, and Bolivia [pdf]](http://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "Paper")
Paper
link
bibtex